I’m republishing this essay in honor of the recent media and legislative pushes by Big Drug to force its vile concoctions (aka vaccines) on those of us who have their game figured out and want no part of it. If they are successful in their efforts, we will all soon be treated to mandatory vaccination — humans, dogs, cats and the entirety of domesticated Mammalia. I suppose if they can find a way to make wild animals pay for vaccines, they will be stabbing them with needles as well. Oh, wait, they already do that. Unfortunately, those animals only pay with their consequent loss of vitality; you and I are actually footing the bill. Read to the end if you have a special interest in the manufactured boogie man called “Parvo”.
Recently, I participated in a discussion on a cat forum about the pros and cons of micro-chipping. One of the “cons” was that chipping is thought by some to cause or contribute to cancer. Personally, I’ve been sitting the fence on micro-chipping, but not because I think it causes cancer. It doesn’t. Cancer is a progressive, systemic, complicated disease that takes much more causing than simply implanting a tiny foreign object into the flesh. Overall, I think chipping may actually offer more benefits than disadvantages for cats that are allowed to roam.
That is, with the possible exception of those belonging to the unfortunate people living in municipalities where chipping is being used by government to enforce vaccination compliance. This is something I wasn’t aware of before this discussion. Thankfully it hasn’t happened yet in the community where I live, although I’m sure it’s being planned. However, this represents a very good argument against microchipping, and I stated so on the forum.
Of course this led to the inevitable contentious discussion of vaccination of pets in general, because those who are in favor of it typically have very little tolerance for dissent, even if it’s only mentioned in passing.
It occurs to me that I haven’t written much here about vaccination, so I wanted to take this opportunity to share part of that discussion. Now that government has partnered with industry to relieve us of our choices in this and many other matters, there is some risk involved in speaking out against it. So I understand why some people choose not to. For myself, I could be scared away from speaking the truth. I have to think it’s safe for now, however, because the people who support vaccination and profit from it are just too big to care about squeaky little mice like me.
After I let it be known in the discussion that I felt vaccination of pets enforcement was a good reason not to microchip, the moderator of the list wrote that she could “never appreciate the dismay of people who’s (SIC) cats had died from diseases easily prevented by regular vaccination”. Meaning, evidently, that anybody who chooses not to vaccinate pretty much deserves to watch their animals die of “contagious” and preventable illness.
In my reply, I decided to not pussy-foot around since my days on the cat forum were obviously numbered anyway:
It’s an understatement to say that the truth of this matter will seem foreign to some, but for the sake of those whose minds have not yet been enslaved by the medical view of disease, I will say it anyway: No presumably deadly disease was ever prevented by vaccination. Vaccination is entirely and wholly irredeemable in concept and in practice. That governments, educational systems, industries and entire populations believe and teach otherwise is a testament to the human capacity for wishful thinking, propagandizing, rationalizing, story making and belief (as opposed to knowledge).
There is a whole explanation of the true causes of disease and what vaccines do when they *appear* to prevent sickness that we never hear. This explanation takes everything we know about nature into account and makes all the pieces fit together, unlike the theory of contagion, which is full of holes and lapses of logic. The real causes of disease are ignored by doctors and vets when they go looking for microscopic scapegoats and proclaim that their poisons would have been able to prevent disease. No dog or cat ever died because it was not vaccinated, yet millions have died prematurely due to the long-term harmful effects of vaccines.
I remember what it was like to hear these ideas for the first time, 22 years ago. I was amazed and intrigued, but I was not ready to hear them as they conflicted with what I wanted to believe at the time. So I forgot about them for another 10 years or so until I happened upon them in a different context. This time, they found fertile ground in my mind and at that point I had a lot of work to do, re-thinking everything I thought I had known about sickness. It’s scary to learn the truth, but there are a lot of perks, too. Among other things, it puts control for our lives and those of our animals back in our hands instead of disinterested (or, worse, financially invested) third parties. I wouldn’t exchange that freedom for any happy delusion.
And, with that, I was promptly and unceremoniously kicked out of the cat forum. Such is the near-unanimity enjoyed by the practice of vaccination of pets at present, in this so-called age of enlightenment.
As I said in my subject line, there is no middle ground on the issue of vaccination. You either know the truth and reject all attempts to reconcile it with story-making, or you’re enabling the scam to continue. Constructive disease, the only kind that is thought to be “infectious”, and the only kind that vaccination purports to “prevent”, is never, ever caused by microscopic life forms. This type of disease is a safety valve, put in place during the long biological history of mammalian life on this planet, to protect against the cumulative effects of harmful influences. When vaccination appears to “work”, one of three possibilities exists: Either statistics are being misused to make it look like the vaccine is responsible for a disease’s natural decline, OR, the set of symptoms allegedly “eradicated” has been renamed so it looks like the previous one no longer exists, OR enough of the people who were vaccinated were so devitalized by the new poisons (the vaccine) that their bodies could not engage the symptoms required to expel accumulated waste. When the symptoms of constructive illness are stopped — whether through vaccination, remedies, or both — wastes only continue to accumulate until chronic disease sets in. When the body is prevented from using its emergency devices, the fall will only be harder when it comes. That’s why those who give in to medical treatments like vaccination seem to have spiraling chronic health problems, and it’s why dogs and cats are increasingly subject to the same degenerative conditions that plague humans.
Recently I’ve been noticing how feverishly the vaccine industry is working to counter all the independent thinking that people are finally beginning to do with regard to vaccination. At every drug store, giant signs entreat passersby to get their flu shots, and in one pharmacy I noticed large glossy color photos of Shingles breakouts had been placed under the glass on the checkout counter. There was an article in the news last week about a hospital back east that had to fire 150 employees for not getting their flu shots. And yesterday, I received an email warning that there is currently a Parvo “outbreak” in the state of Washington. “SEVEN cases have been reported. Make sure your dog is vaccinated!” Seven is an outbreak? How many millions of dogs live in Washington State? Please. Besides that, are we expected to believe that all seven of these unfortunate dogs were UNvaccinated? I have no way of knowing whether they were or not, of course, but it seems rather like a long shot that all seven were not, vaccination being the accepted norm among pet owners that it is. Incidentally, here’s the list of the symptoms of Parvo:
- lethargy
- significant weight loss
- fever
- vomiting
- dehydration
- foul smelling, bloody diarrhea
Does it occur to anyone that these are the primary symptoms of at least a dozen other diseases? It may cause some to wonder what determines a diagnosis of Parvo, anyway. I’ll tell you. It depends on whether a certain spent cellular protein (that’s what a virus is) is found in the blood of the afflicted. If it is, this little harmless piece of cellular debris is declared to be the cause of the disease. If it is not found, the misguided health practitioner goes looking for another lame and unrelated scapegoat to blame, usually some bacterium or other microscopic innocent bystander. All the while, the real causes are ignored.
The dire warning tells us that Parvo is “extremely contagious”. Really? Then why do we have only 7 cases? Why is this disease not running rampant not only among wild dogs, but among the unvaccinated homeless dogs that inhabit rural areas of the state in the thousands, and among those who belong to people who can’t afford shots or forego them for other reasons?
I can guarantee one thing, and that is that all seven of those unfortunate dogs were fed commercial pet food or were otherwise not properly fed.  Death-dealing commercial foods are the real cause of “Parvo” and that’s why the vet industry loves to recommend them, and even makes it their business to take an official stand against proper feeding (see previous blog post on the AVMA’s position paper opposing raw feeding). What would destroy them quicker than if all dog owners knew the truth about how to keep their dogs sickness-free?
Best wishes, Nora